Choice of tools for routine malaria diagnosis among diagnostic Centres in Urban settings of Anambra State, Nigeria.
https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/njpar.v43i1.20
Keywords:
Anambra, RDT, microscopy, urban setting, diagnosis, MalariaAbstract
As malaria elimination efforts continue to show promise, the diagnostic services require constant review to ensure effective
treatment. This study was aimed at determining the choice of tools for routine malaria diagnosis in Anambra State. The
research was a cross sectional study carried out in 2019 and 2021, using the total population sampling technique to enrol
diagnostic centres. Data were collected using pretested questionnaire, and analysed using Mann-Whitney U test, KruskalWallis H test and Chi-square test at a 5% significance level. Microscopy and RDT usage were 73.6% and 68.1% respectively, with 41.8% overlap (p > 0.05). Overall RDT usage was higher, 69.7% than Microscopy usage with 63.6% in Hospital-based Laboratories (p > 0.05). Overall Microscopy usage, ranging from 72.5% to 80.0% was higher than RDT in Private Laboratories, Government-owned Laboratories and Private-owned Laboratories (p > 0.05). SD-Bioline® (38.7%) and
Carestat® (35.5%) were the most commonly used RDTs (p < 0.05). Overall usage of thick and thin blood films were: 74.6%
and 37.3% respectively, with 11.9% overlap (p < 0.05). Giemsa stain had higher, 78.0% usage in preparing thick blood films
than Field stain with 22.0 % (p < 0.05). Usage of Giemsa, Leishman and Field’s stain for thin blood film were: 64.0%, 20.0% and 16.0% respectively (p < 0.05). All the diagnostic centres (100%) report positive and negative results as ‘seen’ and ‘not seen’; with 3.0% of them identifying Plasmodium species while 97.0% report as ‘malaria parasite’ (p < 0.05). Regarding intensity, 1.5% of the diagnostic centres use ‘parasite count / µl of blood’ while 98.5% adopted ‘plus system’ (p < 0.05). Only Microscopy and RDT are used for routine diagnosis of malaria in the study area. However, not all the Microscopy
components are used fully and according to standard. Reasons for the choice of tool / their components were given.
References
WHO (2020). Elimination. World Malaria Report; 4: 38 – 41
Aribodor, D. N., Ugwuanyi, I. K., and Aribodor, O. B. (2016). Challenges to achieving malaria elimination in Nigeria. American Journal of Public Health Research. 4(1): 38 – 41.
Onyido, A. E., Nwankwo, O. S., Chikezie, F., Umeanaeto, P. U., Chukwuekezie, O. C., Egbuche, C. M., Okafor, E., Iwueze, M. O., Ezihe, E. K., and Nwangwu, U. C. (2015a). Malaria parasitaemia among primary school children in Oko community, Orumba North Local Government Area,Anambra State, Nigeria. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research;5(6): 178- 187.
Onyido, A. E., Okafor, A. C., Chikezie, F.M., Egbuche, C. M., Umeanaeto, P. U.,Okafor, E. N., Ezihe, E. K. Iwueze, M. O.,Ogbonna, C. U., and Anumba, J. U.(2015b). Coinfection of typhoid and malaria
fevers among the inhabitants of a sub- urban community in the south-eastern Nigeria.Nature and Science; 13(12): 47- 56.
Aribodor, D. N., Ezenwa, P. C., Aribodor, O. B., Emelumadu, O. F., and Eneanya, O.A. (2015). Malaria prevalence, the use of intermittent preventive therapy and longlasting insecticidal nets among pregnant
women in Onitsha, Anambra State, Nigeria. International Journal of Tropical Diseaseand Health; 8(4):14 –149.
Egbuche, C. M., Ukonze, C. B., Udofia, I. J . , O k a f o r, T. , O k o y e , K . C . ,Chukwuzoba, O. A., and Obasi, C. J. (2019). Comparative assessment of urinebased RDT in malaria diagnosis during febrile and non-febrile conditions. Nigerian Journal of Parasitology; 40(1): 37 – 45.
Nwangwu, R. L., Egbuche, C. M., Mbanugo, J. I., and Onwuzulike, V. I.
(2020). Prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum Infection among Pregnant Women Visiting Community Hospitals in Aguata L.G.A., Anambra State, Nigeria.Biomedical Statistics and Informatics; 5(4):
– 80.
Nnatuanya, I., Ilozumba, P., Nwadike, C., and Uzoegbo, C. (2021). Epidemiology ofmalaria in Nise community, Awka South LGA, Nigeria. South Asian Journal ofParasitology; 5(2): 32 – 44.
Gerstl, S., Dunkley, S., Mukhtar, A., De Smet, M., Baker, S., and Maikere, J.(2010). Assessment of two malaria rapid diagnostic tests in children under five years of age, with follow-up of false-positive
pLDH test results, in a hyperendemic falciparum malaria area, Sierra Leone. Malaria Journal; 9: 28.
Berzosa, P., de Lucio, A., Romay Barja, M., Herrador, Z. González, V. García, L., Fernández Martínez, A., Santana Morales, M., Ncogo, P., Valladares, B.,Riloha, M. and Benito, A. (2018). Comparison of three diagnostic methods (microscopy, RDT, and PCR) for the detection of malaria parasites in representative samples from Equatorial
Guinea. Malaria Journal. 17: 333 11. WHO (2021). Prevention. WHO guidelines for malaria; 4: 23 – 69
WHO (2015). Why quality assurance of malaria microscopy should be improved. Malaria microscopy quality assurance manual version 2; 1: 1 – 5.
Schellenberg, D., Willey, B., and Grobusch, M. P. (2010).Improved Patient Care with better Malaria Diagnosis. Therapy; 7(1): 7-10.
FMoH (2014). Current situation of malaria control programme. National Malaria Strategic Plan. 2014 – 2020. National Malaria Elimination Programme, Federal Ministry of Health, Nigeria. 3: 33 – 45.
Mbanefo, A., and Kumar, N. (2020). Evaluation of malaria diagnostic methods as a key for successful control and elimination program. Tropical Medicine and InfectiousDisease; 5: 102 – 117.
Wongsrichanalai, C., Barcus, M. J., Muth, S., Sutamihardja,A. and Wernsdorfer, W.H. (2007). A Review of Malaria DiagnosticTools: Microscopy and Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT). American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 77(6 Suppl): 119 -127.
WHO (2003). Current situation of RDT use. Malaria Rapid diagnosis, Making it work, 5:8 – 10.
WHO (2021). Case Management. WHO guidelines for malaria; 5: 71 – 115.
Aribodor, D. N., Nnabuenyi, S. C., Aribodor, O. B., Ejiofor, O. S., and
Ugwuanyi, I. K. (2017). Pattern of malaria diagnosis among health care facilities in Anambra State Nigeria. Edorium Journal of Infectious Diseases, 3: 12 – 16.
Egbuche, C. M. (2021). Prompt and accurate diagnosis, a veritable tool in malaria diagnosis. In: Current topics and emerging issues in malaria elimination (A. J. Rodriguez-Morales (ed)). Published by
IntechOpen. ISBN: 978-1-83968-484-5, Chapter. 3: 36 – 52.
WHO (2000). Report of a Joint WHO / USAID informal consultation 25 – 27. October 1999. New Perspectives: Malaria Diagnosis. Pp 29.
Bell, D. J., Wongsrichanalai, C. and Barwell, J. W. (2006). Ensuring quality and access for malaria diagnosis, how can it be achieved? National Revised Microbiology; 4: 7 -20.
WHO (2018). Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 8 (2008–2018). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2018.
Ajumobi, O., Sabitu, K., and Nguku, P. (2015). Performance of an HRP-2 rapid diagnostic test in Nigerian children less than 5 years of age. America Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene; 92:828–33.
Cheesbrough, M. (2009). Parasitological tests. District laboratory practice in tropical countries; Part 1. University Press, Cambridge, 5: 239-258.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nigerian Journal of Parasitology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
